A British couple says they're being held like "prisoners" on a Caribbean island with their four-month-old baby after unexpectedly delivering their child at sea, reports say.
27.07.2023 - 18:16 / smartertravel.com
Fees are now more or less an expected part of booking airline travel, especially bag fees. But as the practice grew over the past eight or nine years, consumer advocates have fought for, if nothing else, maximum transparency around what those fees are so that consumers can make informed buying decisions. Until now.
The Trump administration’s Department of Transportation announced it will cancel a proposed rule that aimed to require airlines to display their bag fees to customers throughout the entire booking process.
The rule forced airlines and ticket sellers to display the total ticket cost up front, rather than add in those fees late in the process. Airlines and ticket sellers can do this if they choose, and hopefully many still will. But eliminating this rule gives airlines total leeway on what fares they display, and allows them to entice consumers with a fare that is much lower than the final booking price. In some cases, customers may be several steps into the booking process before they know what they’re paying.
Related: 7 Smart Ways to Bypass Bag FeesThe administration said the bag fees disclosure rules would have a “limited public benefit.” But to consumers, this could be a mess. Airfares are becoming increasingly arcane, with multiple classes of economy tickets, widely varied fee structures, and a wide range of booking and comparison options. Eliminating the ability to compare total pricing up-front not only creates a ton of extra legwork, but increases the likelihood of missing out on the lowest fare or the best value. Which, of course, is the point.
Is it possible to compare total prices up front? Of course. Airlines are still required to display their full menu of fees from a link on the homepage. That’s of course not as ideal as having those bag fees baked in to the fare displayed in your initial search. In fact, the booking process absent this rule is almost deliberately cumbersome: Instead of simple, clear side-by-side comparisons, passengers will need to take notes, do math in their head, and go deep into the booking process with multiple airlines or ticket sellers.
If airlines need these bag fees to remain in business, so be it. (In a related move, the administration also nixed a rule requiring airlines to disclose total revenue from ancillary fees.) But customers deserve better than this. There is already pushback to reverse the reversal, so let’s hope it succeeds.
Customers have, grudgingly or not, accepted that fees are the cost of doing business. So a little transparency shouldn’t be too much to ask. Or is it?
What do you think of the original proposed rule? The cancellation? Comment below
More from SmarterTravel: Study: Baggage Fees Help with On-Time Performance Do BaggageA British couple says they're being held like "prisoners" on a Caribbean island with their four-month-old baby after unexpectedly delivering their child at sea, reports say.
Iraq's prime minister has launched an investigation after a bear being transported on a commercial airplane escaped from its crate in the cargo hold.
I spent the first seven years of my life in the United Kingdom and still have some British terms and phrases in my vocabulary.
When the new Tron coaster opened at Disney World's Magic Kingdom back in April, theme-park reporter Madison Blancafor, couldn't wait for her chance to ride the high-speed coaster, based on the popular sci-fi franchise.
A New Jersey-bound Delta Airlines flight turned around mid-air and headed back to a Massachusetts airport after an anonymous caller told police that a passenger on the plane made threats about the flight, authorities said early Monday.
Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) have a novel proposal to alleviate the expected congestion at airport security checkpoints this summer. In a letter sent this week to executives at 12 U.S. airlines, the senators called on the carriers to “suspend bag fees for the summer”:
Smoking traditional tobacco-packed cigarettes has been banned on most U.S. commercial flights since the late 1980s. But the “No Smoking” signs didn’t specifically prohibit the latest nicotine-delivery device, e-cigarettes.
With multiple airlines (at the time of writing Delta, Alaska, and American) instituting a “smart luggage ban,” travelers have a right to be concerned if they travel with that pricey smart bag they bought. The part of the product in question is the suitcase’s battery, which with new regulations, must be removed in order to bring the bag onboard.
Spirit Airlines waived fees.
Since its unannounced implementation on a Friday evening last February—strategically timed to avoid public notice and minimize media scrutiny—Delta’s policy of not publishing award charts has been a source of consumer frustration and outrage.
Another August means another summer drawing to a close, and pangs of desire for one last fair-weather trip. Late summer and early fall travel can be a science that’s hard to perfect, but do it right and you’ll find great shoulder-season deals in destinations perfect for one last warm-weather getaway.
United has come in for more than its fair share of criticism lately, from travelers, from employees, from Wall Street. Now, the Department of Transportation can be added to the list of United-bashers.