Airfare costs for domestic flights are expected to level off and even drop this month before rising again ahead of the holiday season, according to a new report.
27.07.2023 - 18:27 / smartertravel.com
The debate over inflight phone-calling raged hot and heavy two years ago, with the opposing forces seemingly gaining the upper hand. The Association of Flight Attendants called for an outright ban on the calls. A no-call bill was introduced in Congress. The DOT signaled its general opposition to inflight cell use on safety grounds, in particular that it would distract passengers from attending to routine safety announcements and flight crew instructions in emergency situations. And several airline CEOs pledged it would never happen on their planes.
While the DOT never formalized its inflight call policy, the FCC did:
Although that might seem to put an end to the matter, it doesn’t. The FCC rule allows for the possibility of making calls via WiFi, as is easily done using popular phone apps such as FaceTime, WeChat, and the like. And WiFi calls are no different from cellular calls in terms of their effects. They’re annoying, disruptive, and, as has been argued by many airline workers, they can create an unsafe condition in flight.
Related:The Case for Making PreCheck FreeWhile that loophole has existed since the FCC rule went into effect, travelers and U.S. airlines have proceeded as though there were an outright ban on inflight calls.
This week, the DOT proposed a new rule that brings the issue of inflight calls sharply back into focus. The rule explicitly acknowledges the possibility of using WiFi or other non-cellular technology to make calls, and requires the airlines to advise passengers prior to booking if inflight calling is permitted on their flights. According to the DOT:
Yes, of course travelers should be fully informed if their flight would allow calls. That’s simple transparency, and seems uncontroversial. What should raise eyebrows about the DOT’s proposal is the fact that it acknowledges that the question of inflight voice calls hasn’t been resolved.
Confusingly, the proposal can be interpreted in either of two ways. One, the DOT is gently suggesting that airlines consider allowing inflight WiFi calls. Or two, the Department is using the possibility of WiFi calls as a spur to create a new rule that goes beyond the FCC’s, to prohibit all voice calls. And indeed, according to its announcement, “The Department is also seeking comment on whether disclosure is sufficient or whether it should simply ban voice calls on flights within, to, or from the United States.”
The mixed messages here show that the DOT mixed up its priorities, misplacing the emphasis on communicating a product feature rather than on the feature itself. The Department should have first evaluated the desirability of an outright ban on all inflight voice calls. If such a ban were deemed in order, the advance-warning rule
Airfare costs for domestic flights are expected to level off and even drop this month before rising again ahead of the holiday season, according to a new report.
As thousands of flight disruptions on Monday due to severe storms spanned across the East Coast, U.S. airlines have called on the the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to extend a waiver that allowed them to cut back on service.
In 2014, at the behest of Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), the DOT’s Office of Inspector General began an audit of U.S. frequent flyer programs, and the DOT’s monitoring thereof, with a particular focus on unfair and deceptive practices (summary, with a link to the full .pdf report, here). The audit results were published this month, with the following headline: “Improvements needed in DOT’s process for identifying unfair or deceptive practices in airline frequent flyer programs.”
To all appearances, the hot-button issue of inflight phone calls has been settled. If you’ve flown on a U.S. carrier lately, you’ve almost certainly heard no one yakking on a cellphone or other mobile device while airborne, and you might well assume that there’s an outright ban on inflight calling.
Update, September 18: The FAA has issued updated guidance regarding usage of Samsung Galaxy 7 phones in flight, stating “passengers may not turn on or charge the devices when they carry them on board a plane. Passengers must also protect the devices from accidental activation, including disabling any features that may turn on the device, such as alarm clocks, and must not pack them in checked luggage.” The statement does not mention if any penalties are associated with failure to comply with this guidance. Read the full statement here.
Smoking traditional tobacco-packed cigarettes has been banned on most U.S. commercial flights since the late 1980s. But the “No Smoking” signs didn’t specifically prohibit the latest nicotine-delivery device, e-cigarettes.
When American Airlines merged with US Airways, American’s disgruntled unions were unanimous in their support for what amounted to a hostile takeover of the much-larger American by Doug Parker and his mid-sized US Airways.
Lufthansa pilots are striking for the 14th time since 2014 in their attempt to extract better wages from the carrier.
Tired of slow, expensive inflight WiFi? So is American, and it’s suing Gogo, the industry’s largest supplier of inflight WiFi, demanding that Gogo either up its game or allow American to switch providers for 200 of its planes.
Last week the State Department released a vague warning about Mexico travel to Playa Del Carmen, saying it had “received information about a security threat,” and prohibited government employees from traveling there for several days.
Consolidation is the enemy of competition. That’s an axiom of economic theory. And it’s a truth known to any kid who was forced to cut the price of his lemonade when the neighbor opened another lemonade stand across the street.
In case you hadn’t noticed, the Big Three legacy airlines have changed their pricing policy for multi-city trips. And yes, you guessed it: The new policy makes such trips more expensive. In some cases, much more expensive.