Given the climate-change activism that’s intensifying around air travel’s dependence on fuel, you’ve probably seen a lot about “carbon neutral” flights lately, along with reports of planes that can be powered entirely by something called “biofuel.” The idea behind both is obvious: People want to add as little carbon as possible to the atmosphere. And the idea that we can take carbon neutral flights is true—but it’s more nuanced than you might think.
Related:How to Go Carbon Neutral on Your Next Flight What Are Carbon-Neutral Flights?
Here’s a bit of clarification on the issue, and what travelers should know about carbon neutral flights.
Biofuels (which are fuels made from plants, and therefore not fossil fuels) do not contribute less carbon than regular petroleum-based fuels when they burn. They do, however, absorb carbon when they’re growing—offsetting the new carbon that’s created when they burn. So: Flying a jetliner on biofuel doesn’t reduce the amount of carbon injected into the atmosphere in itself; rather, it’s an accounting process.
It might surprise some people that making a flight carbon neutral is a mathematical rather than an engineering process. Simply put: The reason biofuels can be called carbon neutral at all is that while they were growing the plants used to make the biofuels generated enough oxygen and took in enough carbon dioxide to offset the carbon later dumped into the atmosphere. In photosynthesis, plants, algae, and some microbes absorb carbon dioxide, water, and solar energy, and convert them into oxygen and sugars. The plants, algae, and microbes use the sugars to build their structures and do whatever else they do. So when you convert those plants, algae, and microbes to a useful fuel and burn them in a jet engine, you’re just returning the amount of carbon that the sources originally took out. But unlike fossil fuels, biofuels are renewable: After you harvest a batch, you grow another.
How likely is it that this changes? Present technologies offer no practical way to power transport aircraft other than by burning fuel containing carbon in the atmosphere, regardless of how that fuel is produced. Battery/electric and solar/electric flights may be practical for short-haul or specialized applications, but if you want to fly from New York to California, the only way to get you there right now is by burning something. If you could burn pure hydrogen rather than hydrocarbons you could (in theory) fly carbon neutral, but hydrogen requires very large and very heavy tanks. For now, it’s fly by adding carbon to the atmosphere, or don’t fly.
But any time you can substitute a ton of biofuel for petroleum, you’re coming out ahead. And the atmosphere doesn’t care whether you burn that
The website maxtravelz.com is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.
You pass so close to towering red rock canyons in southern Utah that you expect to hear scraping or see sparks as you glide by. They loom so dramatically over you that you stare without blinking. And if you’re on board the train Rocky Mountaineer, you have glass domed and sided coaches to take it all in, all of the majestic landscape on the Rockies to Red Rocks journey between Moab, Utah and Denver.
In April, when the FAA removed restrictions on additional flights at Newark Liberty International Airport, the hope was that other airlines would increase their share of the airport’s flights, in the process eroding United’s dominance and near-monopoly pricing in that important market.
Understandably, Virgin America loyalists are an unsettled lot, with their perky, tech-forward airline now set to be absorbed by an airline whose personality is represented by a scowling Eskimo.
Food pics on Instagram feeds can sate even the biggest visual appetite. Search a hashtag such as #food or #restaurant and you’ll find the world represented through its dishes. A sweet bun served up in a village tea house in Myanmar, a high-concept amuse bouche straight from Paris, a mile-high roadhouse burger from somewhere along Route 66—there’s something for every taste.
Looking for a new museum to add to your travel to-do list? TripAdvisor (SmarterTravel’s parent company) has released the Travelers’ Choice Top 25 Museums of 2018, including the top 10 worldwide and the top 10 in the United States, with some surprising frontrunners. The findings also highlight bookable ways to see each winner—think VIP tours and scavenger hunts—with some offering the added perk of allowing you to skip the lines to get in.
The best place in the U.S. to buy a vacation home is Sevierville, Tennessee, in the foothills north of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. That’s the lead finding of a new report from Vacasa, the major vacation home rental site. The report names the top 25 locations for buying a vacation home based on capitalization, or “cap rates,” which is a ratio of home cost and the income a property can produce by being rented out.
Summer, also known as high season for travel, is almost here. And according to AAA just about everyone is poised to hit the road. The organization predicts two-thirds of what it categorizes as “leisure travelers” plan to take vacations this summer, meaning millions of Americans will be hitting the road.